The single most important action animal shelters can take to save lives

In which Jill promises this won’t be a boring techie blog post.

SingleMostImportant.jpg

I’ve always loved dogs. Some of my first memories are with family pets, and many of them (both the memories and the pets) were fun.

Others are sad. Like when my dad, at his wits end, took my dog Beau to the pound. Beau had jumped the fence one too many times. That’s when I learned what animal shelters do to dogs. Throughout my life, I’ve adopted, rescued, fostered, and advocated on behalf of homeless animals. As my friends and family (and neighbors and people in line at Starbucks and the guy at my shoe repair) can tell you, I’m pretty adamant about pet adoption.

But only after I began volunteering at some of L.A.’s high-kill shelters did I start to comprehend what could be. Many shelters are run by good people who are trying to manage a system in which supply exceeds demand. Many are also dirty, loud, underfunded, short-staffed, often managed by overwhelmed public servants with little leadership training, who are poorly measured.

When we volunteer at shelters, we find long lines of people waiting to meet animals. When it’s their turn, they are asked to complete paper-based forms in triplicate, sign liability waivers, be interviewed, and wait until someone is available to show them a dog or cat. It’s a bureaucracy, reliant on paper-based processes and outdated systems. Shelter staff spend more time at filing cabinets than at kennels. The phrase “take a number and be seated” is still alive and well at municipal shelters — as are “We don’t have anyone who can show you the animal” and “Sorry, that one’s been put to sleep.” Many potential adopters leave shelters frustrated or worse, empty-handed.

This is where technology comes in. By entering the digital age — think mobile apps, real-time, online profiles for the canine set — shelters can save more lives. They can match animals to likely adopters, stem owner turn-ins through intervention and temporary foster programs, deploy low-cost spay and neuter services to ZIP codes with the highest surrender rates, and perform more targeted outreach based on public demographics and preferences.

I have done extensive ROI analysis on how applying digital technologies to the public shelter system can drive smarter workforce management, redistribute animals to lower-kill shelters with empty cages, predict adoptability, reduce or eliminate paper-based processes, and dramatically decrease euthanasia rates. Most public shelters still do this work manually, if they do it at all. The potential for automation to drive economies and accelerate animal save rates is indisputable. And there are shelters out there that would love to have those capabilities.

The opportunity to modernize technology for social good isn’t exclusive to animal shelters. Technology can be used for ensuring clean water in poor communities, reducing opioid abuse through targeted intervention and curtailing rampant incarceration rates, to name a few public-sector efforts currently powered by data.

A few years ago DJ Patil, America’s first chief data scientist under the Obama administration, introduced The Opportunity Project, an open data effort aimed at sharing information with civic leaders, teachers and other community members to drive access to services and encourage community engagement.

“Always focus on the individual,” Patil told the audience. “There’s a social contract companies have with citizens, and vice versa. By understanding and using rich and available data, we can drive social change.”

It’s a new era of case management — whether the case represents a citizen, a customer, a patient or your new family pet — and technology will be its salvation.

Previous
Previous

A proposal: Let’s make rescue glamorous!

Next
Next

The emerging trend of data for good